One of the most essential
functions of management is to create willingness amongst the employees to
perform at a high level. That being
said, the role of a leader is creating an environment to enhance interest in
performance of employees. Motivation is a powerful tool for employee
performance, particularly when it is induced by management. Over time there
have been numerous studies that have tried to explain how motivation works. The
advantages of motivation are numerous and include things such as enhancing overall
organizational productivity, improving product quality and can increase
employee unity. What must be kept in
perspective is that employees' motivation varies from employee to employee;
what motivates one employee might not motivate another employee. Just as motivation must not be considered as
a single entity, neither must the trait that leaders possess. The style of leadership that focuses on
traits can be traced back to the argument that leaders are born versus being
developed. Through personal experience
and research, I would definitely state that there are innate qualities and
characteristics possessed by strong leaders as addressed by author Gary Yukl in
his book Leadership in Organizations, Table 6-2 (Yukl, 2013). However, this thought process is not without
flaw; certain leadership traits will not always identify successful leaders and
predict there overall effectiveness. Factors such as the type of organization
can also have a huge impact on the effectiveness of a leader, no matter what
traits or skills they possess.
Since joining the military at the
age of 18, I have become very in tuned with my leadership skills, traits, and
competencies. These personal abilities
that I possess have changed over time for various reasons. I would like to think that I continue to gain
knowledge when it comes to using the certain leadership skills and traits for
success. I have taken numerous
personality and leadership assessments to include the Keirsey Temperament
Sorter, DISC assessment, Dealing with Conflict Instrument (DWCI) and the Myers-Briggs
Type Indicator. To this date I have not
been surprise by any of the results. By analyzing
the results of these assessments I have been able to identify at what stages in
my life certain traits blossomed and when some were suppressed. I believe
I possess some of the skills mentioned in Yukl, Leadership in Organizations,
Table 6-3 (Yukl, 2013). Conversely my strengths
are concentrating my aptitude to formulate ideas; conceptual skills. These
ideas have been heavily influenced by both internal and external environments
in which I have held leadership positions.
I feel this has given me an advantage over other leaders because I have
held positions in the Department of Defense, Retail, Corporate America and the
US Federal Government; all having different standards of operations. These differences have allowed me to understand
how to lead around situational variables and remain successful. On the
other hand, these differences have taught me how to focus on particular
variables related to the environment that might determine which particular
style of leadership is best suited for the situation. This was particularly true when it came to
the military because there was more control over the qualities of the employees
and a better understanding of presented situations.
No comments:
Post a Comment