For this leadership analysis, the question of the day is
what it means when we say that leaders must create a “cause” or
"meaning." Without a doubt
past and present leaders have lead followers throughout times of struggle. The article mentions that even when
environmental situations seem degrading and dangerous, people still persevere when
there is good solid leadership leading them.
But how does leadership connect with followers to give them that sense
of cause or meaning. For example, I can
think of biblical heroes such as Moses who had to lead the Hebrews through many
difficult situations, the Egyptian soldiers, the Sinai Desert, a lack of food
and even those that questioned him and the journey they were on. Other examples
that come to mind to support this article include the story of the heroic king,
Leonidas of Sparta and how he led 300 of his finest soldiers to battle a heavily
favored Persian conqueror, although the story has been modified for effect,
there is no doubt that the followers believed in a cause, knowing their odds of
their survival. Even recently, Dr.
Martin Luther Kings has been seen as a leader who was able to get people to
find meaning in something they believed in.
The one thing all these leaders had in common is that they were agents
of change; whether it was being forced upon them or if they were the ones
instigating it. This process of change
was not a challenge for them because they had a vision of what needed to be
done and the benefits. The challenge was
the followers and how to get them to adopt the same cause. What we must keep in mind is than Dr. King
did not say I have a plan for change, he stated repeatedly that he had a dream,
something everyone can believe in.
Saturday, February 23, 2013
A511.6.4.RB - A reflection on “Getting Beyond Engagement to Creating Meaning at Work
Sunday, February 17, 2013
A511.5.4.RB...Remote Leadership article
Or this assignment, I am going to discuss the article, entitled
“Remote Transformational Leadership”, written by the numerous researchers, but
led by E. Kevin Kelloway. The overall
purpose of this research was to look at transformational leadership from two
study perspectives as it relates to remote leadership. The article failed to provide a support
definition. Because to that, for my
response I will define transformational leadership as a style of leadership in
which the leader identifies the needed change, creates a vision to guide the change
through inspiration, and executes the change with the commitment of the members
of the group. Study one focused on electronically-mediated
leadership in its infancy. The focus was
on the perceived effects of transformational leadership,
management-by-exception, and laissez-faire from two aspects of employee morale
as it relates to transformational leadership. The second study’s purpose was to
build on these results by examining the effects of remote leadership on
motivation and performance using a laboratory-based investigation.
There were two different hypotheses for this study. Study one was primarily interested in two questions: can recipients perceive and accurately identify leadership a style communicated by e-mail and is receiving an e-mail with a positive leadership message as opposed to a negative message perceived to be associated with positive outcomes? Study two hypothesized that individuals exposed to e-mail messages containing a charismatic or intellectually stimulating message would express higher levels of task motivation, and demonstrate higher levels of performance on a laboratory task than individuals who received e-mail instructions that did not contain these aspects of transformational leadership.
Two different research methods were used for this
study. First research method was
students reading vignettes that focused on electronic email that communicated laissez-faire,
management by exception, contingent rewards and the second research method was students
reading an intellectually stimulating message electronic message concerning transformational
leadership and a problem solving task.
Two different population samples were used for both research methods in
these studies. Study one was 175 undergraduate students and study two 105
undergraduate students. However, I do not feel the study results were supportive
of the research goals. As stated in the
article, neither the covariate nor the interaction attained statistical
significance.
I am not sure if the research contains any tangible
value. The findings suggested that
remote transformational leadership can still have the same positive effects on
performance and attitudes that occurs with face-to-face interaction. This fact has many unanswered questions, due
to the fact that information can be received differently when delivered through
an electronic medium (the finding are not definitive). Findings also suggested that electronically
mediated communication channels may be used to convey the same leadership
message as in face-to-face interaction, which questions the suggestion that
leader-follower distance has a negative effect on performance and followers
perceptions of their leader. Again, the
significance of the results was not well supported in this research. I feel the study was too general and the
population was too small. While these
findings await replication in field settings, they suggest considerable promise
for the effectiveness of remote transformational leadership.
Friday, February 8, 2013
A511.4.4.RB - Leadership Analysis
One of the most essential
functions of management is to create willingness amongst the employees to
perform at a high level. That being
said, the role of a leader is creating an environment to enhance interest in
performance of employees. Motivation is a powerful tool for employee
performance, particularly when it is induced by management. Over time there
have been numerous studies that have tried to explain how motivation works. The
advantages of motivation are numerous and include things such as enhancing overall
organizational productivity, improving product quality and can increase
employee unity. What must be kept in
perspective is that employees' motivation varies from employee to employee;
what motivates one employee might not motivate another employee. Just as motivation must not be considered as
a single entity, neither must the trait that leaders possess. The style of leadership that focuses on
traits can be traced back to the argument that leaders are born versus being
developed. Through personal experience
and research, I would definitely state that there are innate qualities and
characteristics possessed by strong leaders as addressed by author Gary Yukl in
his book Leadership in Organizations, Table 6-2 (Yukl, 2013). However, this thought process is not without
flaw; certain leadership traits will not always identify successful leaders and
predict there overall effectiveness. Factors such as the type of organization
can also have a huge impact on the effectiveness of a leader, no matter what
traits or skills they possess.
Since joining the military at the
age of 18, I have become very in tuned with my leadership skills, traits, and
competencies. These personal abilities
that I possess have changed over time for various reasons. I would like to think that I continue to gain
knowledge when it comes to using the certain leadership skills and traits for
success. I have taken numerous
personality and leadership assessments to include the Keirsey Temperament
Sorter, DISC assessment, Dealing with Conflict Instrument (DWCI) and the Myers-Briggs
Type Indicator. To this date I have not
been surprise by any of the results. By analyzing
the results of these assessments I have been able to identify at what stages in
my life certain traits blossomed and when some were suppressed. I believe
I possess some of the skills mentioned in Yukl, Leadership in Organizations,
Table 6-3 (Yukl, 2013). Conversely my strengths
are concentrating my aptitude to formulate ideas; conceptual skills. These
ideas have been heavily influenced by both internal and external environments
in which I have held leadership positions.
I feel this has given me an advantage over other leaders because I have
held positions in the Department of Defense, Retail, Corporate America and the
US Federal Government; all having different standards of operations. These differences have allowed me to understand
how to lead around situational variables and remain successful. On the
other hand, these differences have taught me how to focus on particular
variables related to the environment that might determine which particular
style of leadership is best suited for the situation. This was particularly true when it came to
the military because there was more control over the qualities of the employees
and a better understanding of presented situations.
Saturday, February 2, 2013
A511.3.4.RB - Reflection Blog: Leadership Analysis
The understanding and comprehension of leadership, power and influence is not a new concept in today’s society as we know it. Look at talk shows, the Internet and various journals and magazines, you will find various articles, conversations, and debates. These intellectual information exchanges about leaders have gone on for years and years dating back as early as 1513 by the Italian diplomat, historian and political theorist Niccolò Machiavelli who raised the question of whether it is better to have a relationship based on love (personal power or as I see it influence) or on fear (position power). To date, this argument is still a center piece of many conversations. Great leaders have mastered how to use power and influence to create a leadership identity that subordinates believe in and are willing to follow whether it is morally right or wrong. When we think power and influence we often think of leaders with virtuous objectives. However, some of the most memorable leaders who were able to use power and influence have changed the history of the world. With that statement, many would not realize I am referring to Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Pol Pot. In the textbook Leadership in Organizations…8th editions, author Gary Yukl makes it very clear that understanding leadership power and influence is not a simple endeavor. Various concerns must be taken into consideration for a leader to be successful. Not only must a leader look at the internal and external environment, they must take into consideration themselves, subordinates, peers and even their bosses.
It is a well-known belief that everyone possesses and exercises some type of power in their professional and personal. Personally, I would like to think I have a solid understanding of what type of power and influence I possess and I understand the nature of the source. I have learned that Expert and Informational Power fit my personality very well. The nature of both is based on me being able to combine my life experience with my in-depth education. I often find myself using both powers to support my opinions and thoughts during conversations, during lectures and during various confrontations. I also use them in my personal life; sometimes the outcome is good and sometimes the outcome is not so good. The good is when dealing with my kids and on the flip side my wife tells me I will try to manipulate arguments by focusing on certain words said by others to prove someone wrong. As individuals components, I think I lean more on expert power; using my gained knowledge as a subject matter to influence others. I also use this type of power to influence situations at work because I do not currently hold a supervisory position.
After enrolling in this course I have even come to realize that I am using this course to increases my expert power and credibility. Just a I use both listed powers to lead, I have also learned to use them as a follower. I have learned to listen and learn, enhancing my type of power and influence. Like they say, to lead one must learn to follow. When it comes to peers, I find myself withholding information for my own needs. I have even been told that I possess knowledge that others need or want, but I know I am not willing to share that information freely. Although it may seem selfish, I feel that individuals need to go through the same steps I did to gain that credibility and status. As far as addressing the question of having experienced high quality LMX situations within my current workplace, I would have to say no. My current organization is so cold and rigid; this type of relation between leader and member would be considered suspicious more than anything.
It is a well-known belief that everyone possesses and exercises some type of power in their professional and personal. Personally, I would like to think I have a solid understanding of what type of power and influence I possess and I understand the nature of the source. I have learned that Expert and Informational Power fit my personality very well. The nature of both is based on me being able to combine my life experience with my in-depth education. I often find myself using both powers to support my opinions and thoughts during conversations, during lectures and during various confrontations. I also use them in my personal life; sometimes the outcome is good and sometimes the outcome is not so good. The good is when dealing with my kids and on the flip side my wife tells me I will try to manipulate arguments by focusing on certain words said by others to prove someone wrong. As individuals components, I think I lean more on expert power; using my gained knowledge as a subject matter to influence others. I also use this type of power to influence situations at work because I do not currently hold a supervisory position.
After enrolling in this course I have even come to realize that I am using this course to increases my expert power and credibility. Just a I use both listed powers to lead, I have also learned to use them as a follower. I have learned to listen and learn, enhancing my type of power and influence. Like they say, to lead one must learn to follow. When it comes to peers, I find myself withholding information for my own needs. I have even been told that I possess knowledge that others need or want, but I know I am not willing to share that information freely. Although it may seem selfish, I feel that individuals need to go through the same steps I did to gain that credibility and status. As far as addressing the question of having experienced high quality LMX situations within my current workplace, I would have to say no. My current organization is so cold and rigid; this type of relation between leader and member would be considered suspicious more than anything.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)