Saturday, January 25, 2014

A630.2.4.RB - 21st Century Enlightenment


After viewing the above video, reflect on the following questions in a well-written post on your Reflection Blog:

Why do you think the talk is titled 21st Century Enlightenment?  Matthew Taylor provides an interesting perspective of how he views the world through his term “21st Century Enlightenment”.  After reviewing this video, my perception of 21st Century Enlightenment is about how we as a people should start to think differently than in the past.  We should have a higher level of empathy that will transfer our current level of thinking beyond what we consider to be the cultural norms.  Taylor suggests that society should rethink how we see certain perspectives of society.  Some of the areas he focuses on are autonomy, universalism, and world progress.  My problem here is that I feel Taylor has taken many liberties with his presentation.  Mr. Taylor’s views bring several questions to mind.  What culture is Taylor speaking for?  Is he speaking for a certain generation of the population?  Is his presentation politically motivated in some way?  Yes Mr. Taylor’s presentation is titled 21st Century Enlightenment; but no matter how interesting and captivating, there need to be an understanding that enlightenment is not a new movement and it affects various cultures in different ways. 
What does Matthew Taylor mean when he says "to live differently, you have to think differently"?  Taylor made a good point in how he pointed out that if individuals have a desire change the way they live, in areas such as different principles, values, morals, standards; individuals must be open to changing the way they think.  Even I must agree that I sometimes get caught up in my life, not thinking that others experience some of the same things that I do.  Normal human behavior will always wish for some type of change; but in reality we do not make a plan to actually achieve such change.  Taylor explains that to live differently, we must respond purposely.  Once we learn to respond with a purpose, individuals will start thinking differently and breaking the learned responses of old. 

At one point in the video (4:10), Taylor argues that we need "to resist our tendencies to make right or true that which is merely familiar and wrong or false that which is only strange". What is he talking about? Can you think of an example within your company or your life that supports this point? After listening to this quote several times, I feel it implies that humans are not comfortable with change; internal or external.  To me, Taylor is expressing that we should not just go along with the crowd, but we should question the status quo.  Truth be told, individuals have diverse values and traditions and we should be careful with defining what is considered normal or right for society.  Society has to break the cycle of accepting certain practiced tendencies and routines because it has always been done that way or even worse become like the lemur in which we do what everyone else is doing just because.  In the organization for which I work, we fail in this area.  Some people at work never have to help with group projects, however, when the completed project is a success everyone receives the same rewards or praise. All of my coworkers that worked on the project new that some people did not participate in the process, but no one ever complains.  We are more reactive than proactive and you may find yourself an outcast or even labeled as a trouble maker if you challenge the status quo. Truth be said, we cannot be afraid of change; we need to strive to understand and accept change.
Taylor argues that our society should eschew (avoid) elements of pop culture that degrade people and that we should spend more time looking into what develops empathetic citizens. Would this be possible?  To me the answer is no, however the real question is what would it take for this process to become reality.  In today’s society, pop culture would seem to be more popular than religion.  When was the last time a list was made of the most influential people in society and someone engrossed in pop culture made the list.  Pop culture is engrossed in social media and technology and is influenced by various groups of people that share similar thoughts.  This movement is influenced by everything from movies and television shows, to actors, singers, toys, games and clothes. With so many technological advancements, we have become sponges to everything that surrounds us and our culture is now part of us; many future generations not only absorb it, they welcome it.   The world has changed and I am not sure if we can be as empathetic as Taylor suggests.  We should not judge each other, but we do. Certain aspect of society still want to determine issues like who marries whom, how everyone should look and dress, or even complain about the color of the skin of the president. Whether or not we develop that empathetic attitude will only be determined by the future generations.  Personally, I feel younger generations; seem to be less judgmental and more accepting than older generations of society.  

At the end of the video, Taylor talks about atomizing people from collaborative environments and the destructive effect on their growth. What is the implication of these comments for organizational change efforts? I think Taylor is stating that people should start looking at themselves when looking for organizational change. Change starts with a few individuals; however these few can get more to follow in their beliefs for change.  Today’s business organizations are rapidly changing, trying to keep up with technology advancements in every way we can dream.  We must understand that if we are to kick start organizational change, we must learn from both positive and negative results of our actions.  Being accountable and living in a responsible manner is not simply a matter of will; bottom line is we must have an in-depth understanding of who we are as individuals and how we fit in our society or organization.
What can you take away from this exercise to immediately use in your career? I sometimes get caught up in the world and how my actions affect the groups and teams I am exposed to.  I need to be aware of how these actions affect the organization and what I must do to ensure my actions have a positive effect.  Even though my role in the organization may be small, the effects may be large in the grand scheme of things.  I am not sure if I need to develop a sense of empathy as it relates to others, but it is something I, at least need, to consider.  I am not sure if this will enhance my career, but if I never try, I will never know.  I do know that we as a society are not without any empathy because we have made progress.  It may not be at the level Mr. Taylor would like, but in order to change had vision and incite beyond the norms of the past. So I will remember Taylor’s rendition "21st Century Enlightenment", hoping to learn from it.

 
Taylor, M. (2010). The 21st Century Enlightenment. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AC7ANGMy0yo&feature=youtu.be

Thursday, January 16, 2014

A630.1.4.RB - Board of Directors


Describe a situation from your organizational life that was similar to the situation from the video. Describe the situation in detail making sure to discuss how the organization was able to work through the difficulties to enable real change to occur.
____________________________________________________________________________

It is amazing how a simple cartoon can deliver such a powerful message.  Even though the You Tube video titled “A Tale of Power and Vision” will make you smile, at the same time, it will make you reflect on the struggles of organizations that are going through a change process.   In my adult career, I have seen this type of struggle in both corporate America and in various federal government agencies. It is amazing how a few individuals with power and authority; that are not open to change can stagnant change within an organization. 

I have witnessed this type of behavior on many occasions during my working adult career.  In my previous organization, I was one of many engineers serving in a supervisory position.  One of the biggest issues for a large manufacturing organization is how to address the union.  The union in the organization I am referring to have a very negative attitude when it related to corporate policy.  Many of the older employees often threaten managers by saying that they were going to file grievance when they did not get what they wanted.  When I arrived, this was well established as a cultural norm of the organization. 

During a staff meeting one of the older employees decided he did not want to work with a certain individual because of his race.  He felt that because he was a Vietnam veteran, he should not have to work with people from that nation.  This was totally against company policy and a situation that needed to be addressed.  The problem was current management was not willing to address this situation due to the union; so they gave him his wishes. This employee believed that the need for diversity and inclusion did not apply to him.  The managers believed they did not have to enforce the diversity policy and it was easier to let employees choose with whom they would work. At the time, these corporate cultures bred negativity when it came to the idea of diversity.

When I and several other supervisors spoke to the operations Vice President, he was very upset when he learned about the situation.  He was new to the organization and had a different mindset than the previous senior leader.  After communicating the company policy to the management team, he was able to get everyone board.  There were a few individuals who demonstrated resistance because they did not want to deal with the union.  However, it was explained to them that this was a corporate policy that would be followed, did not violate any employee labor laws, and was a key part of the supervisor’s responsibility.  In the end, the enforcement of the policy became the new norm; with some of the older supervisors still trying to cling to the old way, saying the news way was too much work.  Discrimination grievance and lawsuits went down and overall productivity of the manufacturing organization increased.  The change implemented was for the betterment of the organization and team, and as far as I know, that process is still in effect today.